Talk:One (Casualty)

One (Casualty) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 17, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from One (Casualty) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Casualty production team wore medical scrubs on-set during the filming of the episode "One" so they could disguise themselves if they were caught on camera?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One (Casualty).

Wikipedia

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: British / Holby Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Holby task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:One (Casualty)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks for the speedy review. I shall respond to the comments ASAP. Soaper1234 - talk 19:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: I believe I have responded to all your comments. Let me know if I need to do anything further. Soaper1234 - talk 13:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Is there a secondary source that can be used for the runtime?

I've had a look and cannot find one. Soaper1234 - talk 19:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "television series Casualty".

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"and the NHS" → "and the National Health Service (NHS)" (to explain to readers what you're talking about)

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"are trained" and "which covers" should be in past tense since this is from 2016/2017.

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a comma after "Twitter hashtag".

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

The plot section is 397 words (without the names) so that passes MOS:TVPLOT.
On the other hand, are the names of each actor necessary if there's already a #Cast section?

Removed cast section, so would be needed. Plus, it is first occurrence of names. Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "passed onto Jacob".

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"walks in the" → "walks into the"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a comma after "Duffy, Chloe".

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be "difference in people's lives" rather than "difference to"?

Done Soaper1234 - talk 19:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

Try to be consistent here and in the rest of the article between "sister Lisa" and "Sister Lisa".
The Instagram image doesn't exist anymore / is dead. Find a replacement or remove the claim.
Remove the colon after "including".

I've just removed the section as I've realised it isn't that crucial. The guest stars are already listed in the infobox and regular cast are mentioned throughout the article. Let me know if you disagree with this though. Soaper1234 - talk 19:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to comment on whether the section was necessary. Either way, great way to be bold!

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Since the episode has already aired, certain phrases in this section and in the rest of the article should be in past tense.

Read through and corrected tenses. Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casualty → Casualty

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"fly on the wall" → "fly-on-the-wall"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are there three paragraphs (2-4) in this section of plot and reviews?

Paragraph 2 explains the format of the episode, with real-world information supporting it.
Paragraph 3 is real-world information about the two work experience women. I don't mind removing this paragraph if you don't feel it is needed.
Paragraph 4 is basically quotes about the episode explaining what the episode is designed to be; how the cast and production team envisioned the episode. Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove commas after "to a stage", "Duffy, Chloe", "cast, crew", and "two boom operators".

There was only a comma after "to a stage". Did you mean add a comma after the other three quotes? Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Soaper1234: Yeah, I meant that commas should be added after "Duffy, Chloe", and then after "cast, crew", and after "two boom operators". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"one of production sound mixer" doesn't sound right

Fixed Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"support cast" → "support the cast"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"same to regular" → "same as regular"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"there was no cuts" → "there were no cuts"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"equivalent to" → "equivalent of"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"is billed" → "was billed"

Reception

"highest rated" → "highest-rated"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uses of "which is" feel repetitive, and some are not necessary.

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, some uses of "is" should be "was" since this already aired.

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"for crew" → "for the crew"

Done Soaper1234 - talk 13:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Archive all archivable (either manually or with this tool).

Completed in this edit before the review began. Soaper1234 - talk 20:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark video references from BBC / BBC One with "url-access=registration".

Done Soaper1234 - talk 20:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·