Talk:On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Vorstellung

In the "Philosophical" section, the article claims "...this 'idea' is semantically distinct...from Berkeley's use of 'idea.' " How is Vorstellung different from Berkeley's idea?Lestrade (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

In Danish, which is closely related to German, the word forestilling is used in the same manner as its German equivalent Vorstellung, distinguishing it from the word idee, which corresponds to German Ide and English idea. Linguistically speaking, idea in English corresponds to idee (Danish) and Ide in German. Now forestilling/Vorstellung would be closer to English apprehension, conception and imagination.

"Auffassung" is "apprehension." "Begriff" is "conception." "Einbildung" is "imagination." "Vorstellung" is either "presentation" or "representation." Lestrade (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Sufficient reason?

Thanks for the article but I still don't understand the concept of "sufficient reason". Obviously this is an answer to a long history. Maybe the "philosophical background" section should be augmented.84.97.87.172 (talk) 01:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In a judgment, a predicate that is attributed or denied of a subject must be based on at least either another judgment or on a perceived object.173.72.115.21 (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Wally Neighbors[reply]