Jump to content

Talk:Olympic Tower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk14:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Tower
Olympic Tower

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 22:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Length and history verified. All online refs verified, rest taken in GF. No copyright issues. Images good. Only issue is that in ALT1, reference shows it was not the Robert F. Wagner Jr. who was mayor, but rather his son, who was never mayor but at the relevant time chaired the city's Planning Commission. The hook needs to be so amended. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Whoops, I did not realize I made that mistake. That is a good catch - I sometimes get confused between the two. I have fixed it now. Epicgenius (talk) 23:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Olympic Tower/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]