Jump to content

Talk:Olek (artist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOlek (artist) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 13, 2011Good article nomineeListed
November 28, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 3, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that participants in performance art by Polish-born American artist Olek (pictured) are literally crocheted into her body suits, without fasteners?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 5, 2018.
Current status: Good article

File:Olek 100pc Acrylic DumboArts-2009-09-26.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Olek 100pc Acrylic DumboArts-2009-09-26.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olek artist Thank You For Your Visit.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Olek artist Thank You For Your Visit.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Olek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 12:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Thank you for nominating this article. I enjoyed it. No disamb. links. Fn 2 has a is dead link to nymag.com.[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Article needs a lead. Although there are introductory paragraphs, they cover new material rather than summarize what is below. For example, the yarn bomb quote should be moved to the body of the article.
    "First using crocheting as part of her art in 2003, and crocheted the windows of a burned-out, abandoned building near her 2005 residency in Utica, New York.[10]" - sentence needs a subject and verb.
    I've done a complete overhaul of that part: it was implying the windows were her first project, but she did student work before then. Working on that now.
    "was inspired "by a uniformed attendant holding the sign Hold the Handrail in a Taipei metro station".[14] Performers held placards of signs found by the artist, that were "emphatic, ironic or amused dialogue with their location."[13]"->"was inspired "by a uniformed attendant holding a "Hold the Handrail" sign in a Taipei metro station".[14] Performers held placards based on signs found by the artist, that were "emphatic, ironic or amused dialogue with their location."[13]"
    Changed.
    "ripped off" can mean stolen. The cnnmoney site says it was removed by the caretaker of the park. Perhaps you can find different words?
    Clarified.
    Exhibit dates are Aug 10 — Aug 27, 2011 so can we say "August 2011"?
    Pardon?
    "A 2011 solo show will be held at Jonathan LeVine Gallery.[26]"->"A solo show will be held at Jonathan LeVine Gallery in August 2011.[26]"
    Cool, thanks.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    As noted above fn 2 needs repair.
    Fixed, there was a space in the URL.
    Fn 6, 7 and 24 are bare URLs. I suggest using {{cite web}}.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    "Olek has exhibiting in the United States, Brazil, Costa Rica, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Turkey. " - needs footnote
    C. No original research:
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    What is her educational background? Discuss it in the prose and not just the infobox.
    Expanded a bit.
    Please summarize any critical reception of her work.
    Despite the fact she's going to exhibit at the Smithsonian, I can't find any critical reviews of her work. The only commentary on her work seems to come from reporters who don't specialize in art critique.
    Has she written about her motivation or conception of her work?
    The closest to that seems to be the 2009 quote, can't find anything else comparable.
    What medium did she use prior to 2003?
    I can find mention of her prof liking her student work that involved crochet, but nothing about her other works, aside from what's on her official website.
    When did she immigrate from Poland to the United States?
    Can't find any sources for that. If I tweeted her, and she replied, could I cite her tweet?
    You could forward it to OTRS. However, it is a non-controversial fact that does not require a cite to a secondary source.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    No edit wars.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I am placing the article on hold so that you may address the above noted concerns. Racepacket (talk) 12:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 8 reading

[edit]

We are almost done:

  • Technically, the lead should only contain facts that are included elsewhere in the article. Please consider moving the "Her creative philosophy is that "Life and art are inseparable."[10]" to the Career section, and then summarize her entire creative philosophy in one or two sentences in the lead.
  • Please fix the [citation needed] in the second paragraph of the "Career" section.
  • I would make the title in fn 23 upper and lower case.

Thank you for your hard work on this article. Racepacket (talk) 02:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry for stalling on this, I didn't realize how much of the subject I hadn't explored, before submitting the article for review. In trying to find the most definitive explanation of her first works using crocheting, to solve the citation needed tag that I had placed on the fact, I found one page that lead to another, including complex artist statements that would require me attending a fine arts university program to be able to condense.
To try and reference some of the things highlighted in her early biographies is impossible. One of the events, a festival in Philadelphia, I really can't find any reliable references to it existing. Obviously, I've left it out. Anyway, here's my updates and expansions. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving the article. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 07:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your guidance, and patience with my delays. This is my first GAN ever, despite being on Wikipedia since 2002, and it was an interesting process. -- Zanimum (talk) 02:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

http://artlog.com/posts/71-olek-anything-but-camouflage http://www.museum-bellerive.ch/en/exhibitions/ http://www.brooklynpaper.com/stories/34/26/dtg_bb_bloomypiano_2011_7_1_bk.html http://www.flickr.com/photos/toddflorio/sets/72157627081555878/ http://www.dziennik.com/news/polonia/21055

balloon prep area

[edit]
  1. http://downtownatdawn.blogspot.ca/2012/03/olek.html
  2. http://www.artinnewyorkcity.com/2012/03/15/exhibit-olek-and-david-e-peterson-2-person-show-synthethic-nature/
  3. http://vimeo.com/38648056
  4. http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/03/oleks_inflates.php
  5. http://www.dnainfo.com/20120316/lower-east-side-east-village/balloons-replace-yarn-crochet-artist-oleks-new-show
  6. http://www.boweryboogie.com/2012/03/oleks-crocheted-balloon-funhouse-at-the-krause-gallery/
  7. http://www.boweryboogie.com/2012/03/olek-returns-tomorrow-night-with-synthetic-nature-at-krause-gallery/

http://www.theupcoming.co.uk/2012/03/06/dont-miss-out-street-artist-olek-crochets-an-entire-room/

Requested move 11 September 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) sstflyer 13:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


OlekCrocheted Olek – We have a pile of hatnotes indicating there are other "Olek" topics, including multiple people with that as their first or last name and also a place. I don't think that this artist is WP:PRIMARYNAME, but instead should be moved to a more specific article-title and leave a disambiguation page here. Lede says she's " known professionally as Crocheted Olek", so that is a natural-disambig choice for her page. DMacks (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move: Proposing changing article name to "Olek"

[edit]

I would like to request changing the name of this article to "Olek" instead of "Crocheted Olek." The artist is not professionally known as "Crocheted Olek," but just as "Olek," which can be demonstrated through multiple reputable sources, including the New York Times ([1]) and The New Yorker ([2]). Ritafoley (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Requested move 6 July 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 09:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Crocheted OlekOlek (artist) – Known professionally as "Olek", not "Crocheted Olek", per the above section. Zanimum moved the article twice without discussion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nomination. Subject's own website, which is appended to the article, depicts this artist's professional name as simply "Olek", not "Crocheted Olek". "Crocheted" has, indeed, been used a number of times as Olek's descriptive adjective, but the single name "Olek" as the actual professional name is also confirmed by links which reference her. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 04:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, obviously. As the person who created the article, I'm not sure why I didn't choose the artist suffix from the start. She was using the nickname early on, but ever since moving to the United States many years ago, it has been simply "Olek". -- Zanimum (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reading through the logs, I see that I named it simply Olek, with no suffix. But a user above proposed moving the article in December and no one contested it. I was simply following the Wikipedia editing motto of "be bold". -- Zanimum (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Olek (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]