Talk:Old fashioned glass

Food and drink: Bartending Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Bartending Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Archives

1

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved to Old Fashioned glass. I was going to close as no consensus, but on close reading it seems that there was a weak consensus to move to the new name. Weak, mainly since everyone did not comment on using it. Also this name aolready had some incoming links so it was being used in some articles. In any case, if this is not acceptable the move discussion can be restarted. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old fashioned glass → Old Fashioned (cocktail glass) — To specify that it is a cocktail glass. Also, to make the capitalization in the name of the glass the same as the capitalization in the name of the cocktail (Old Fashioned). Wahrmund (talk) 20:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do people normally call this glass an "Old Fashioned"? If not, the title "Old Fashioned glass" is a better option. I appreciate the idea to change the capitalization, since it is "a glass for an Old Fashioned", rather than "a glass that is old fashioned". ComputScientist (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's called either an Old Fashioned glass or a rocks glass, which is a redirect to this page. Wahrmund (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. But it is not merely called "an Old Fashioned" (without saying glass), is it? I mean, if this article would never be called "Old Fashioned" (as opposed to "Old Fashioned glass"), then it should not be called "Old Fashioned (cocktail glass)". ComputScientist (talk) 13:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. --Born2cycle (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, in everyday usage it is called an "Old Fashioned glass." But an encyclopedia ought to be more precise in its language. Wahrmund (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. First, I would support this move if the subject was commonly referred to as just "Old Fashioned". However, there is no evidence of that, and no one is even claiming it. There is no denial that "Old fashioned glass" is the most common name. Second, as to the claim that "an encyclopedia ought to be more precise", Wikipedia naming policy is very clear about this: "be precise, but no more precise than is necessary". The precision that adding "cocktail" to the title in any form brings here is simply not necessary. That is, "Old fashioned glass" already conveys the name of the subject and is not ambiguous. --Born2cycle (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true at all. "Old Fashioned glass" is inherently ambiguous because it conveys the idea of a former style of glassware that is no longer popular or current. "Old Fashioned (cocktail glass)" eliminates this ambiguity and is therefore more precise Wahrmund (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old Fashioned (cocktail glass) would incorrectly indicate that the name of this subject is "Old Fashioned". I would support moving this article to Old Fashioned glass. --Born2cycle (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Born2cycle, be precise but no more precise than is necessary. All of the articles under the glassware theme appear to employ the exact same format, XXXX glass, so I don't see a qualifier as being necessary here. Particularly given this glass type is used for straight scotch or other whiskey, which are not a cocktail.--Labattblueboy (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support this is different from handmade glass panes for windows 76.66.194.212 (talk) 05:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, just because I think the parentheses are wrong. I support the change in capitalization. "Old Fashioned glass" would be best; "Old Fashioned cocktail glass" also OK if a bit too specific (if one person in a million comes here for advice about windows, it's not a big problem!). But with the parentheses "Old Fashioned (cocktail glass)" is like moving Red Square to Red (square). ComputScientist (talk) 09:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Rocks glass" redirects here.

I'm not sure, but doesn't "rocks glass" usually refer to a smaller glass, 4-6 oz, with a more banked shape and a thick base, so that the shot itself is exaggerated and the glass appears full once ice is added? I can't find a decent reference, but this is what I mean. Twin Bird (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The short answer is no — it does not refer to that. Rocks glasses come in sizes 5.5–12 ounces, Wahrmund (talk) 01:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Old Fashioned which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name origin

See my post on the Old fashioned page here about the conflict between the two pages' proposed origins for the name of the glass. I'll remove the info for now. Blippy1998 (talk) 06:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]