Talk:Oklo Inc.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Biased Article

This doesn't read like a neutral Wikipedia article on the company. Instead it reads like marketing material written by Oklo themselves and leads the reader to believe they actually possess licensed reactor designs and reprocessing capabilities when they do not. 98.56.143.194 (talk) 03:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe not, but from a financial return point of view buying before approval will return hundreds of times more than the same investment made upon approval. The bet is… can they do it? 71.121.232.157 (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"incredible safety benefits"? is this current Wikipedia standards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.202.188.253 (talk) 06:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it a first pass to tone down the puffery and clarify that the reactor hasn't been built yet. Please feel free to make any further adjustments as you see fit. Justin Kunimune (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]