Talk:Oil shale in Estonia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oil shale in Estonia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 2 months

Oil shale in Estonia has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 11, 2014. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Oil shale in Estonia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,012 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Estonia generates 90 percent of its power from oil shale?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/November.

Wikipedia

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Estonia Mid‑importance

Oil shale in Estonia is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

Copied Oil shale in Estonia (oldid, history) → Kukersite (diff) on 2014-04-20
Copied Oil shale in Estonia (oldid, history) → Graptolitic argillite (diff) on 2014-11-09
Copied Eesti Energia (oldid, history) → Oil shale in Estonia (diff) on 2014-12-09
Copied Oil shale in Estonia (oldid, history) → Viru Keemia Grupp (diff) on 2016-01-17

Checking in

Hi Beagel. *embarrassed waive from around a corner* How is it going? It's been awhile and I honestly forgot... But I just wanted to check in with you if you are taking it to featured articles? Because I think the article is very very good (my nitpicks notwithstanding). Renata (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same here. It's now a very good – dare we say excellent? – article. CorinneSD (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Renata and CorinneSD. Thank you very much for your kind words. Unfortunately I have been extremely busy in the real life and last two weeks I was even away from the access to Internet. I agree that the article is in the good shape (thank you both – it is only due to your extremely valuable feedback and assistance!) and I certainly plan to take it to FA. However, I wonder if it still needs some fine-tuning. I still wonder if it is possible to implement some more suggestions made by Renata. Maybe it would be also useful to have one more proof-reading from the beginning to the end? Beagel (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to read through it once more, maybe tomorrow, and I'll ask Rothorpe if he would, too. He's good at catching small errors in references, formatting, etc. CorinneSD (talk) 23:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Saarnak

An editor marked this source by Martin Saarnak as unreliable. While it is true that self-published sources are largely not acceptable as reliable sources, there is exception concerning self-published expert sources, which may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. Martin Saarnak fully satisfies this criteria. Therefore, this source should be considered as reliable. However, as this page as changed its status to invited readers only, and there are other sources in this article supporting information, I will remove that source for now. Beagel (talk) 08:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phase out?

Hello Beagel

The article says:

"The government coalition of Estonia has decided that Estonia will stop shale oil extraction by 2040 at the latest."

but you wrote in a comment

"there is no plan to stop shale oil production"

So I am a bit confused - is that not a contradiction?

Chidgk1 (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2040 is political decision/commitment in the coalition agreement, but no legal act making it legally binding has been adopted yet. Beagel (talk) 18:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Beagel, I have included citations from the IEA's 2023 energy policy review, affirming Estonia's transition towards renewables and its commitment to reduce reliance on oil shale. The nation is targeting climate neutrality by 2050 and achieving 100% renewable electricity by 2030. HerBauhaus (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]