Talk:Officiant

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

This article has a highly Christian (specifically Catholic) perspective. The term officiant is frequently used to describe non-Christian clergy, but this article gives no consideration of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.218.92 (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article needs to be somehow combined with Celebrant (Australia) which appears to be the best history of civil celebrants and Funeral celebrant and Ceremony. Not quite sure how to do all this but I shall; put this entry on my list and see if I can tidy it up a bit!! Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 22:29, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my own remarks -- I would have no objection to this article being removed. There are a number of articles on Civil Celebrants, They are sometimes called officiants but this entry is religious in nature. I believe it serves no purpose but dilutes the whole scene. As far as I am concerned whoever has the power to do this - go ahead and delete!Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]