Talk:Odium theologicum

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Just some notes on the article. Strangely, most of the current article talks about science rather than religion. The scientific material should go, or at least be relegated to a minor sub-heading. It is on the whole fairly poor, and should add the following:

1. History, etymology, and background 2. Examples 3. Revisions of history - prominently, the revaluation of the Gnostics after discovery of the actual texts. 4. Cross-cultural examples - India, middle-east, etc. Comparison of styles of religious criticism in various contexts, and discussion of whether religious controversies in India, say, deserve to be labelled under the same heading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.241.165 (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]