Jump to content

Talk:Occupation (Battlestar Galactica)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 23:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review soon. Ruby2010 comment! 23:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • One dab link needs fixing
  • Several parts of the episode changed from the script, more predominantly the scenes involving a suicide bombing, which the producers were worried that the Sci Fi Channel would not allow it to be included Awkward phrasing
  • The resistance uses one of the dead drops to get through a communications block... Add bolded
  • "Precipice" needs a wikilink in the production section
  • In the original drafts, the resistance was not planning suicide bombings, but "freaking the Cylons out" by imprisoning many of them in a secret underground prison, torture them for information, and leave them alive instead of killing them, as they would resurrect otherwise, which would scare the Cylons who would worry about their missing comrades Awkward phrasing
  • the scene was intead used for "Precipice Typo
  • In 2007, the episode has been nominated Tense issue

Just a few minor tweaks above, and the article will be ready to go. In the meantime, I'm placing it on hold for seven days. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 00:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Matthew RD 18:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]