Talk:Observer's paradox

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

[Untitled]

I'm not a physicist, so feel free to remove/revise the statement about Schrodinger's cat. Nobi 01:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

double blind

"Many researchers believe that the evidence that a Hawthorne effect exists has been exaggerated."

It would be hard to do a double-blind study to determine the stregth of the effect, especially since if what you cared about was the workers viewpoint, it would not be structured as a double-blind experiment. ( Martin | talk • contribs 19:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]