Jump to content

Talk:Observations and explorations of Venus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

It would be nice to combine this page with the other page "Exploration of Venus". This page is the better one, but some information from Exploration of Venus could be included.

"Exploration of Venus" contains too much of a bias toward Magellan, and glosses over all other missions. This page could use a little more information about Magel

Merge done.... but it will need cleanup. Cwolfsheep 19:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article cites no sources; notice of such added. Drooling Sheep 10:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why don't we add a timeline tab like the one in the mars article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SquallLeonhart ITA (talk • contribs) 10:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Venera 9 panorama.gif

[edit]

Image:Venera 9 panorama.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "first" to observe Venus

[edit]

I don't think that the Babylonians were the first to observe Venus considering it's one of the brightest objects in the night sky. Maybe the original author meant something else. Also, the Historical observations section needs to be sourced and probably even redone. --AntigrandiosËTalk 00:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The first culture to have a proper writing system is the Sumerian, and indeed they had a goddess (an Anunnaki) to represent that sky object. They had a cuneiform writing system that is older than the Babylonians'. So indeed the assertion that babylonians were the first to observe venus is incorrect. there is little doubt today that the Sumerians knew about the solar system since in fact they had depictions (in tablets) of stars orbiting a larger one (aka the sun) but they didn't have proper star catalogues. The ones to firstly develop that were the babylonians. So Venus was really not catalogued until the babylonians, but the sumerians were producing solar star system schemes before that. So yes, indeed Sumeria's Venus (Inanna) is older than babylonias' Ishtar. However we should be sure that no culture before had depictions of venus in caverns or murals to declare the Sumerians as the first astronomy oriented civilization, and I think that is subject of much debate today as some ancient Amerindian (north america) culture has been discovered that predates the mesopotamical sumeria and most likely they were into astronomy too (could be either orion or venus they were focused on). So about the article, more references are needed to include sumeria in the tale of the observations. 181.56.97.143 (talk) 19:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I am very concerned about the use of non-free images to denote the operators of spacecraft in this article (I think it is just the JAXA logo in this article). They can easily be replaced in this manner with text indicating the agency name, and therefore their use here violates copyright, and cannot be justified as fair use. --W. D. Graham 09:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Observations and explorations of Venus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Observations and explorations of Venus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Observations and explorations of Venus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a mess!!! mixing up religious views with nasa explorations

[edit]

A separate article Venus in Religion should contain the references to mesopotamical/egyptian/greek goddesses that have represented the natural phenomena. mixing up things like "theosophy" with nasa explorations does make little sense to the article's title. 181.56.97.143 (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a separate article Venus in culture to handle detailed descriptions of how Venus was interpreted in various mythologies and religions. I will par down those sections of this article and leave only information about its observations, not its mythic interpretations. Dinoguy2 (talk) 19:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved

Rocket Lab

[edit]

This mission should be worked in at some point. There's not yet much detail, so it's not clear if it fits into the article yet.

Rocket Lab is sending the first private mission to Venus in search of supporting evidence of organic compounds in the cloud layer - traces of life. The goal, using an Electron launch vehicle and Photon spacecraft, is to send a probe to around 30 miles’ altitude, where Venus’ atmospheric conditions are closer to those found on Earth.

xlynx (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Observations?

[edit]

How come this article is named Observations and explorations when other planets are just exploration? Exploration of Mars Exploration of Jupiter Exploration of Pluto

It needlessly conflates ancient observations with modern space exploration. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Observations_and_explorations_of_Venus&oldid=1257552248"