Talk:Observations Made During a Voyage Round the World
Appearance
Observations Made During a Voyage Round the World has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Observations Made During a Voyage Round the World appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Johann Reinhold Forster's 1778 book Observations Made during a Voyage round the World has been described as "the beginning of modern geography"? Source: David Stoddart (geographer): "The original edition ofJ. R. Forster's book, published in 1778, marked the beginning of modern geography, in that it deployed the comparative sense of firsthand observations across perhaps one-quarter of the earth.", see Stoddart, David R. (1996). ""A Learned, Intelligent, and Judicious Traveller"". Geographical Review. 86 (4): 604–610. https://www.jstor.org/stable/215935
Moved to mainspace by Kusma (talk). Self-nominated at 09:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC).
- New article that was moved to mainspace on 27 October 2021 is 4,670 characters and nominated one day later. No copyvios detected (AGF books and journals which can't go through Dup detector; high confidence of violation due to chapter names). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 149 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 21 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source from JSTOR (AGF as there is no preview available). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Bloom6132! The article is available via The Wikipedia Library, see [1] (probably only works after logging in/accepting a cookie from TWL). —Kusma (talk) 08:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- New article that was moved to mainspace on 27 October 2021 is 4,670 characters and nominated one day later. No copyvios detected (AGF books and journals which can't go through Dup detector; high confidence of violation due to chapter names). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 149 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Refs 21 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source from JSTOR (AGF as there is no preview available). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)