Talk:Oblique wing

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

History

It is not true, that the oblique wing concept is originated by Robert T. Jones in 1945. There were at least two german wartime projects, the Blom & Voss P.202 and the Messerschmitt P.1109-01 (both 1944)with a proposed OW design. Designer of the P.202 was Dr. Richard Vogt who came to the US via Paperclip and worked in Air force research facilities then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.159.169 (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The mechanism can turn in only one direction

This is obviously supposed to mean that, for example, in one given design it is always the right wing tip that is swivelled forward from the perpendicular position.

The above phrase though implies that the wing, once swivelled, cannot turn back to perpendicular.

Can anybody think of a better verbalization?--Cancun771 (talk) 07:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of anything right off, but probably needs to say something about swiveling or pivoting rather than turning. - BillCJ (talk) 08:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed oblique wing

This article considers that the oblique configuration is variable only, but there have been demonstrators built with fixed oblique angles, and proposed full-up aircraft with fixed configurations. The article should be repaired. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with DSI/NASA Oblique Wing RPV

This can be adequately covered in the parent article. 2 sentences from a single reference does not an article make RadioFan (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's a distinct aircraft meeting WP:N. Moving the content into the overall article wouldn't improve either. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Per Andy Dingley. See also Wikipedia:Notability (aircraft). — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion: Moving the specific article to NASA Oblique Wing RPV would help disambiguate it from the NASA AD-1, but that is a different issue. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to DSI/NASA Oblique Wing RPV per cited source. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oblique wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]