This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Apologies for any formatting mistakes - I have to tried to figure out how to link references correctly but I'm still unsure of how to do this. Accessvirus (talk) 03:26, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's use of digital oscillators is not English; see Wiktionary on the difference between it's and its. Even emended, I see no advantage in use as an abstract noun over use as a verb. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson22:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I fretted a it over this and decided that just dropping the mention of digital oscillators may be the best thing to do in this case. --OpenFuture (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the article stands now is pretty much as good as I can make it. The image doesn't work in the infobox at the moment, that seems to be a cache problem. I don't know how Wikimedia works, so I'm hoping the problem will go away. :-) --OpenFuture (talk) 11:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
