Talk:O'Reilly Open Source Award
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
move to O'Reilly Open Source Award?
[edit]Edited article to reflect Google name not used since 2010. Should article be renamed? Mike Linksvayer (talk) 20:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent question. It's hard to say the awards are the same when half of the companies granting them went away, particularly when that half is arguably the biggest half. I don't have the answer, but have nevertheless proceeded to renaming. Count this as a weak support for renaming. If others feel this is wrong, I won't resent a revert. --Chealer (talk) 04:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Add basic information of why they won?
[edit]Should we add some basic information (1-2 lines each) on what the person did? What their contributions were etc.
And what about people who don't have a Wiki page?
People would have to google them specifically. We could provide a link to their homepage etc.?
Will be happy to do this if it makes sense.
dufferZafar (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Just a list of winners
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- moved discusssion to Talk:OSCON#Proposed_merge_of_O'Reilly_Open_Source_Award_into_OSCON
There's not much here and hardly any WP:INDEPENDENT sourcing. The whole article should be merged to OSCON which itself is pretty anemic. Toddst1 (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion started at Talk:OSCON#Proposed_merge_of_O'Reilly_Open_Source_Award_into_OSCON. Toddst1 (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.