Talk:Now What (Lisa Marie Presley album)

Fair use rationale for Image:LisaMariePresley-NowWhat.jpg

Image:LisaMariePresley-NowWhat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music Category

I Guess I'm confused how the label New Wave got there in the first place which was not referenced to begin with. Presley music has never bee defined as New Wave which is antiquated term at best for her music. PS no reference stating it is New Wave. Will remove if no reference is found.66.108.86.141 (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok the original genre was Rock not New Wave which was added later with no reference so what should I do remove New Wave and leave it just Rock not POP? 66.108.86.141 (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This User " 03:24, 19 October 2011‎ 203.82.95.83 " added NewWave with out a reference which is why I removed it.66.108.86.141 (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok this link which is already referenced in the info box http://www.allmusic.com/album/now-what-edited-r732258/review List the album as pop/rock not New Wave!66.108.86.141 (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move the Presley album as suggested, move the House episode to Now What? (House), and move the dab page to Now What; no move of the Deep Purple album, which has just gone through its own RM where it received a more distinct title. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now What → Now What (Lisa Marie Presley album)
~~Now What ?~~Now What?! → Now What (Deep Purple album)
Now What? → Now What (House M.D. episode)

– these need disambiguation considering their almost identical names at current, and that "?" can't be typed into a browser URL addressbar, since it has a special meaning in HTTP. Now What would then be replaced by a disambiguation page created out of the hatnote (sample available at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Now What (disambiguation)) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC) 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The last article should be moved to Now What? (House), in line with the naming of other House episodes. There's no good reason to remove the question mark. --BDD (talk) 00:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now What ? is suggested moved to Now What ?!, but I believe that should be to Now What?!. Apteva (talk) 01:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There is no technical restriction against using a question mark, although it does need to be escaped and not used directly. Apteva (talk) 01:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - these all need disambiguation, per nom for albums then Now What? (House) per BDD, - do not support Now What?! per Apteva since not sufficiently helpful for disambiguation purposes. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Then it would be Now What?! (Deep Purple album), but since there are no other Now What?! articles, why does it need to have Deep Purple album added? As I see it we are dealing with three articles, none of which have the same name, and none of which require any clarification:
- The purpose of articles is to explain what the article is about. The purpose of the title is to just display the title. It is only for technical reasons that all titles need to be unique, and in this case they are unique. Apteva (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support first two, but rename episode to Now What (House) - we can't depend on spaces and marks just to distinguish topics. That makes titles look confusing. --George Ho (talk) 06:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Sure, I can see why disambiguation is necessary, but I see no good reason about why the punctuation should be removed (there are literally thousands of article with question marks in the title and it doesn't cause any problems. My suggestions would be Now What (disambiguation) → Now What; Now What → Now What (Lisa Marie Presley album); Now What?! → Now What?! (Deep Purple album); Now What? → Now What? (House). Jenks24 (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note that what was listed as Now What ? has been moved to Now What?!. So we now have three distinct titles, though their differences are slight. --BDD (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've modified the proposal to take into account the renamed page "Now What?!" -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Now What ? is now pointing to the disambiguation page because of "Now What?" also existing. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.