Talk:Nostrana (restaurant)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Nostrana (restaurant). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Coords/map
Resolved@Tagishsimon: Hello! Any chance you might be able to help with adding coordinates and an infobox map here? I've nominated the article for Good status, so this would be helpful before the review, if possible. ---Another Believer (Talk) 06:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Tagishsimon and Jonesey95: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Whims sentence
@Valereee:} You added the following sentence: "Whims has received seven James Beard nominations for Best Chefs in America." This is absolutely true, but I don't think this is a necessary detail for an article about the restaurant, especially when there's a separate article for Cathy Whims. Are you comfortable with me removing this sentence since it's not about Nostrana specifically? Also, thanks again for taking time to review the article today. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Another Believer, no, feel free to revert any changes I made. None of them were ones I am passionate about; simply trying to improve the article as I would any other article I came across that I had any interest in. Wish I lived in Portland or had an upcoming trip, would love to check this place out! Feel free to ping me if you have other restaurant articles at GA, it's an interest of mine. --valereee (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Valereee, OK, thanks, sounds good. And will do! I write about restaurants now and then. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Reception
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Graywalls, can you please share concerns here instead of editing the article while there's an ongoing review? Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
ongoing review... hmm? I didn't see anything on the banner that edits were restricted to certain editors onlyrestricting it. I made the change to the "Willamette Week's Roger Porter" because, it's misleading. I believe we're sort of on an understanding on improper attribution. Graywalls (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- I kept "contributor" but removed the " 's " after "Willamette Week". ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- My first edit removed the name entirely, which wasn't intentional. Errant edits, something you and I have both done. And your point, agreeable. Graywalls (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- My first edit removed the name entirely, which wasn't intentional. Errant edits, something you and I have both done. And your point, agreeable. Graywalls (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Whatever "ongoing review" means, I am wondering if anyone other than Another Believer can comment if the article is considered "off limits" except for a few people while that process is in progress. Graywalls (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: Archiving per interaction ban. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
reviews and reviews stithced up together
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Although users post favorable reviews, my experience is that food critics and reviews within publications only public flattering contents. I don't know if it's the proper MoS or if it's common outside of my local area articles, but articles around my geographical area of interest are written in very similar manner. Most of substance of this restaurant's article is written from stitching up routine reviews, as are many other. Is this the way articles are supposed to be written? Graywalls (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Note: Archiving per interaction ban. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)