Talk:Northrop Loom

"Operative"

I believe it's inappropriate to use the word "operative" as a noun to describe the person who operates a loom. User:ClemRutter has offered a citation, but the citation is to a book using the word as an adjective ("the operative weavers"), not as a noun. I don't think that example justifies using it as a noun. However, if ClemRutter (or anyone else) thinks it's important to use "operative," I'd be content to leave it in the article provided it is in quotation marks and the citation given. Then it would be a misquote, but not drastic enough to be worth fighting over. 67.158.65.220 (talk) 13:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry if it is strange to you- I grabbed the first online reference at had. The file was open. It is such an unremarkable and common term to not require clarification. A weaver is a skilled craftsman- the term usually refers to handlooms. In a mill, the skilled work was done by a tackler. The tenter, ie the woman/man who tended the looms while they operated, was called an operative, which in former times had been the operative weaver. I believe it was also used for spinning operatives, leading me to believe that operatives was a more generic term that could be applied to anyone working on the shopfloor in a mill. Perhaps Lancashire Cotton Operatives would have been a clearer reference to give. If you could register, I could discuss this further on your talk page- and explain in the mill where I once had a holiday job, Northrops were worked by operatives. We would be glad of your copyediting skills in the WP:MILLS group. --ClemRutter (talk) 16:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)