Talk:Northover Projector

Northover Projector has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 15, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Special version of the SIPs grenade?

Did the Northover Projector really need a special version of the SIPs grenade? I have quite a bit of original documentation on the projector, but there is no mention of special amunition. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A four-legged tripod?

The text of the article mentions more than once that the weapon was mounted on a "tripod"... yet a tripod has three legs, by definition, and every picture of the Northover Projector shows it with four. Should we change it to the more cumbersome but more accurate "four-legged base" or something? Singe onion (talk) 16:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved. Ironholds (talk) 00:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northover projector → Northover Projector — All WP:Reliable Sources that I can find, which include Mackenzie, Bishop and Lowry, have the second word capitalized as 'Projector' and not 'projector' This should be uncontroversial, but the intended name with the capitalization is a redirect, and I don't know how to move over a redirect. Skinny87 (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.