Talk:North Road, Manchester/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nice article.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is a very solid article. You've really worked hard on it, and I'm always pleased to see that an article has been Peer Reviewed before going to GAN. The prose is good, the text is informative and (I assume) comprehensive. The only thing I can really think of is a picture, either then or what the location looks like now. Anyway, congratulations. Apterygial 08:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the review, my friend. I will endeavour to acquire a photograph of the ground, but that may not be possible until the next time I am in Manchester, which will probably be a fair way away. Anyway, thanks for promoting the article. – PeeJay 10:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)