Jump to content

Talk:North Road, Manchester

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleNorth Road, Manchester is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 19, 2014.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 9, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:North Road (football ground)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nice article.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This is a very solid article. You've really worked hard on it, and I'm always pleased to see that an article has been Peer Reviewed before going to GAN. The prose is good, the text is informative and (I assume) comprehensive. The only thing I can really think of is a picture, either then or what the location looks like now. Anyway, congratulations. Apterygial 08:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the review, my friend. I will endeavour to acquire a photograph of the ground, but that may not be possible until the next time I am in Manchester, which will probably be a fair way away. Anyway, thanks for promoting the article. – PeeJay 10:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dean and Canons / Deans and Canons

[edit]

I'd place a bet that the National Archives and Manchester Cathedral itself are correct in referring to "Dean" singular and that the author of a book on football ground history is more accurate on his football than on ecclesiastical matters. There is only ever one dean of a cathedral at a time - the dean is the head officer of the cathedral (the bishop is the head officer of the diocese). For the owner to have been the "Deans and Canons" of Manchester Cathedral there would have to have been more than one dean. The source is just wrong on this point, surely. BencherliteTalk 21:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any evidence that the group as a whole isn't referred to as "Manchester Deans and Canons". In fact, I have more than one source that refers to "the Deans and Canons of Manchester", perhaps indicating that there was more than one Dean during the time that Newton Heath played at the ground. I'll get in touch with the authors of the sources and get back to you. – PeeJay 21:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As one of the links says, "By the Dean and Chapter Act of 1840, the Warden and Fellows became Dean and Canons of Manchester", for example. There may have been more than one dean during the club's tenancy (and in fact Dean of Manchester suggests that there was), but the lease would have been with "the dean and canons" (or the dean and chapter) NOT the "deans and canons" because there was never more than one dean at the same time! As the first hit on Google for "Manchester Deans and Canons" is, err, this article (and all the other hits without Wikipedia are uncredited mirrors of this article), I think you're the one who needs to show that the cathedral website and the National Archives website are wrong. BencherliteTalk 21:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully my rewording avoids the problem. BencherliteTalk 21:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on North Road (Manchester). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:North_Road,_Manchester&oldid=1209421011"