This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– This may be too soon to be holding this discussion, since the stations are still technically in the planning stages for now. However, it may be beneficial to establish a precedence for what to do with the articles regardless of whenever it is done. Nevertheless, the first two articles are a currently very confusing and absurd affair, since both stations will be both part of the MBTA Commuter Rail system anyhow. Per precedence with the Bellingham Square/Chelsea stations situation, I feel that this is a simple, straightforward, and logical decision. As for the third article, it may make sense to do this for future proofing as well. OrdinaryJosh (talk) 12:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting.signed, 511KeV (talk)18:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: It's just too soon for this. Phase II is not funded, and even the most optimistic plans don't call for it to open until the end of the decade. The names from the environmental documentation should be treated as placeholder names. (There's precedent for that: just among South Coast Rail stations, the name for Church Street changed twice, New Bedford once, and East Taunton flip-flopped.) Meanwhile, "North Easton station" has over a century of being attached to that station. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.