Talk:North Antelope Rochelle Mine

A fact from North Antelope Rochelle Mine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that North Antelope Rochelle Mine is the largest coal mine in the United States?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/North Antelope Rochelle Mine.

Wikipedia

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.mining-technology.com/projects/thunder/
Triggered by \bmining-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 22:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coal grade

I'm pretty sure there's an order of magnitude error in the coal grade. 3.8 MJ/kg would rank it almost five times less energy dense than some of the worst lignite out there. Sadly the source seems to dead link, so I can't recover the original information. Hobbitschuster (talk) 10:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

to add: the issue comes from a glitch (or maybe it was deliberate?) in the conversion template which produces different conversion factors for "btu/lb" and "BTU/lb". The current value is more credible. Hobbitschuster (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Largest mine or not?

"The North Antelope Rochelle Mine is the largest coal mine in the world."

"These two operations merged and North Antelope Rochelle ceded the title of largest mine to Black Thunder in 2012."

Should "is" be "was" in the first sentence? If not, how can both statements be true? 71.56.78.233 (talk) 03:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]