Talk:Norfolk, Virginia, Bicentennial half dollar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Norfolk, Virginia, Bicentennial half dollar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Norfolk, Virginia, Bicentennial half dollar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 28, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 31, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Numismatics: American currency Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American currency task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

There is a request, submitted by --Another Believer _(Talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Featured article on English Wikipedia".

Anniversary

The coin bears two dates - - - 1636 and 1936. And if my math is correct, wouldn't that make a 300 hundred year difference for a 300th anniversary not a 200th.

Or am I missing something? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are five dates. Look on both sides.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, but those other three years of 1682, 1736, and 1845 are 'hidden' amongst 'round table' text. However, the years of 1636 and 1936 are the key prominent dates in the design of the coin and there's still "a 300 hundred year difference."

Also, in the wording for the 200 and 100, the key word is and. In usage, "and" typically infers concurrent, not "in addition to." If a total of 300 was meant, then it would've better to use "plus" which does mean "in addition to" and not concurrent. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The coin was struck on the 300th anniversary. That's the least confusing way to describe it. - gaberivas (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

one-night stand

There's quite a bit of text about "one-night stands" and fornication on this page, and from the history link, it's been on this page for at least several months. All this despite the fact that this article is currently linked directly from the Wikipedia main page, thus inviting scrutiny. On the face of it, it seems like egregious defacement. But since it appears to have been in place for so long without anyone complaining about it, I wonder whether there's some sort of database bug that makes it appear only today. Am I missing something? Riordanmr (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Somebody had vandalized Template:tall image so it didn't appear on the history of this page. Can someone protect it? Candido (talk) 03:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

about initials

Designer's initials on reverse, image is too fuzzy to tell, which designer and which letters? WMS or MES or both?--Jarodalien (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to me like both, with separate WM and ME and a common S.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we will be able to get better images soon. I've been working with Heritage Auctions.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps clarify this in the article after you're sure about it?--Jarodalien (talk) 16:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"In lower field, the monogram is WM(S) + MES, for William Marks Simpson an his wife Marjorie Emory Simpson, the coin's joint designers." Swiatek & Breen at p. 173. I've rendered it without the implied (S) or the (nonexistent) plus sign.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]