Talk:Nordhordland Bridge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I made a number of minor copy-edits.[1]

   Complies sufficiently with the MoS, prose is reasonably good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Well referenced, assume good faith for off-line and Norwegian language sources. Those that I did access supported the cited statements.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough, with unnecessary detail.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitably licensed and captioned, I love the picture of the bridge in fog.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   An interesting article, I had not realised pontoon bridges of such size had been constructed. I am happy to list as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

   Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)