Talk:Node Magazine

Node Magazine was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 5, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 4, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Node Magazine, a hypertext version of William Gibson's Spook Country, is a fictional magazine named after a fictional magazine in the novel?

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blogging (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

GA Status

This article has been assessed as a Fail.

The assessment is as follows :

1) The article is far too short. Its coverage needs to be expanded considerably. For instance, in the introduction it is claimed that it is "a hypertext version of the novel" but no further details of the novel are given. Considering the magazine is about the "Spook Country universe" the details linking the novel and the magazine need to be considerably expanded.

2) Two further sections of the article need to be written i) – a background section on the novel and a basic outline of the plot. I understand that the article is about Node magazine and not the novel but since the magazine is about the novel and its "universe", it's only sensible to provide a basic coverage of the novel. GA Criteria requires completeness in an article's coverage. ii) The magazine is quoted as being a "mini-wikipedia", examples needs to be given, quoted and referenced.

3) All references must be in accordance with WP:CITET

4) Wikipedia articles must be neutral in tone. The quotes sound too gushing "What the unknown Node-maestro has done is poles apart,,,,,,I believe, to a new kind of critical commentary on texts."

Tone down the adulatory language and find, quote and reference adverse criticism of the magazine in order to provide a balanced, critical perspective.

The article needs a lot of work before it can be re-nominated.

Tovojolo 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finished reviewing the article. I hope you are successful once you have have re-written and expanded the article.

Tovojolo 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@ Tovojolo & Skoromesh

The criteria for "Good Article" status may or may not be valid. They certainly seem to be complicated.

Perhaps an article should actually be online for at least a month or two, before it is submitted for such an award ?

"For instance, in the introduction it is claimed that it is "a hypertext version of the novel" but no further details of the novel are given."

Why re-invent the wheel, when there is already a Wikipedia page for Spook Country ?

"Tone down the adulatory language and find, quote and reference adverse criticism of the magazine in order to provide a balanced, critical perspective."

Supposing, there simply is no serious adverse critical reaction at the moment ?

Are you suggesting that, say, the sarcastic comments, from pseudo-anonymous posters on the official William Gibson books discussion forum, written before the actual node.tumblr.com hypertext assisted analysis of the novel was started, should somehow be given equal weight to the mainstream media published comments of John Sutherland an Emeritus Professor of English holding academic posts in both the UK and the USA or the comments of the author William Gibson himself ?

Suggestion for another external reference:

"Spook Country" hyperlink cloud annotations

This is a version of the text annotations in node.tumblr.com with extra hyperlink annotations, without repeating the graphical images, with extra independent hyperlink annotations, re-ordered into chapter sequence order, as one medium / large blog archive file.

MemeticSynthesis 14:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MS, I've added the link. Are you the author? Skomorokh ^incite 17:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Node Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]