Talk:No Limits (2 Unlimited album)

No Limits (2 Unlimited album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 4, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GAN failed

Hello editors. Seeing the current status of the article, it fails to comply the GA criteria and I have to fail it. Below are some coments to improve the article.

The image is not fair in use. NO rationale stated. The other one is fine but I think it needs to be removed.
The infobox needs to be fully filled-in, if theres any. Do not just put et. al. What about the writers?
In the lead, there is a one sentence paragraph. It breaks the prose.
The sections are very short. Try to merge it.
One sentence paragraphing is prevalent in the entire article.
Remove just and redundancies.
For the inline citations, put t after the punctuation and not before the punctuation.
There is no section dedicated for the singles or the entire track. Not the tracklisting, but the prose.
Incomplete dates should not be linked.
Remove the table for the single's chart performances. This is all about the album and not the singles. Probably, you can mention their performances once you've created the song, singles or tracks section.
I recommend you'll use the {{Cite web}} and {{Cite news}} template for the references to achive neatness and consistency.

If you have further questions and for particular comments, drop a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 06:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the comments, I'll read them over and build on what you've said here. Technohead1980 (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Hope to see this at GAN tomorrow? Just kidding. Soon... =) --BritandBeyonce (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:No Limit file.ogg

Image:No Limit file.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title. Moved back to the long term status quo, No Limits (2 Unlimited album). Jenks24 (talk) 11:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No Limits! (2 Unlimited album) → No Limits! – Unnecessary disambiguation. No other article with an exclamation mark that is named "No Limits". Mika1h (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the UK cover doesn't have a "!", neither did this article 24 hours ago, in any case per WP:DIFFPUNCT, and multiple subjects at No Limits. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per IIO. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. But I saw the move request, and I thought--oh, man, I wonder what In ictu oculi will think! Red Slash 05:38, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think it should be restored to yesterday's title of No Limits (2 Unlimited album) per WP:BRD. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but I can see either side of the issue of the exclamation mark. If the band's not consistent, it makes things harder. Red Slash 19:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per User:In ictu oculi and am fine with a return to the original title of No Limits (2 Unlimited album) for both procedural reasons and because the exclamation point is used inconsistently on the cover art and generally does not appear in secondary sources such as music charts. — AjaxSmack 04:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Just as an aside: Get Ready! should probably be moved to Get Ready (2 Unlimited album), especially since the article notes that "the exclamation mark was dropped for the US and UK releases of Get Ready!" — AjaxSmack 06:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on No Limits (2 Unlimited album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100102150831/http://everyhit.com/ to http://www.everyhit.com
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QjUorTXo to http://www.nvpi.nl/nvpi/pagina.asp?pagkey=60461

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No Limits (2 Unlimited album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311010456/http://www.popinstituut.nl/discografie/2_unlimited.163.html to http://www.popinstituut.nl/discografie/2_unlimited.163.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]