Talk:Nissan L engine

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Datsun Truck#Datsun 521|Datsun 521]] The anchor (#Datsun 521) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Datsun Truck#Datsun 720|Datsun 720]] The anchor (#Datsun 720) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Mercedes Heritage

Article had this sentence for a while:

"It was a 2-valve per cylinder SOHC Mercedes-Benz-derived design."

Now it's:

"It was a 2-valve per cylinder SOHC design often incorrectly attributed to Mercedes-Benz. While both are 'inline' engines, the resemblance to the Mercedes is superficial. In 1966, Prince Motor Company merged with Nissan. At the time of the merger, they were licensed to produce copies of the four and six-cylinder engines. Prince Motor Company had also improved and refined the design to such an extent that it was no longer required to be licensed to Mercedes-Benz."

I wouldn't call the resemblance superficial. Take off the rocker cover and it's just like looking at a Mercedes engine. The method of valve lash adjustment is pure Mercedes - adjustable pivot height. While the design may not have been penned by Mercedes, it clearly derives from Mercedes. The original sentence was perfectly correct, it didn't claim that Mercedes designed it, but it is derivative. I think the extra history is informative, but the tone seems a bit defensive. I propose to alter the tone slightly. RB30DE 12:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't a "licensed" engine be the same engine? If it's not the same, why the license? --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 16:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to ask, why does this article say "The design is often incorrectly attributed to Mercedes-Benz" and then devote two sentences to explaining how the design is attributable to Mercedes-Benz? LOL. Any reason that first sentence shouldn't be deleted? Jelliott4 (talk) 02:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

L24

1000hp??? That´s a joke?? I would also like to add that the l24 motors produce 151hp out of the factory and have produced 250hp in peformance engines used by BRE and BOB SHARP RACING during the 70s.

Need to sign your comments. Furthermore the shade of blue on the block is incorrect. It was lighter. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 16:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]