Talk:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 11:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Starting review. 750h+ 07:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

prose

lead

• The cantata belongs to Bach's chorale cantata cycle, the second cantata cycle during his tenure i'd remove the second "cantana

history and words

•  in the first performance of the cantata on 13 ==> "in the first cantata performance on 13"

  I tried "the cantata's first performance". --GA

  I remember that in the FAC of BWV 1, the repetition of "cantata" was criticized ;) - I tried by using the title once (but it is too long to do that often, and removed the one you pointed out, although I am not quite convinced that someone who never heard of Bach's cycles would immediately recognize what is meant. --GA

music

• The orchestra, oboes and strings, plays in this cantata "plays" should be "play"

  The orchestra plays, but I dropped "orchestra", and tried to say what's unusual about that, please check. --GA

• expanding each single line several new lines add a "to" before several

  I used "by", - please check ref Dellal, where the chorale lines are bold and the others not, to see if it could be explained better. I was quite surprised that the librettist sometimes added in the middle of a sentence. --GA

source and image review

• Images look good, mostly public domain, but there is an CC BY 2.5 image of an instrument. Sources look fine too. 750h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

  Image licenses are Chinese to me, can you explain, or could perhaps Dan help again, or could you fix something missing? --GA

  i don't see any problems with the image licensing. --750

  see how little I understand, - I though the abbr meant a problem --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

  haha that's fine. 750h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

verdict

• @Gerda Arendt: happy to pass when all of these are addressed. 750h+ 03:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you for reviewing! Replies point by point. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

  Passing for GA 750h+ 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.