Talk:Nightmare Stage

Croatia: Zagreb Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Zagreb task force.

Merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was no consensus to merge. I have voted here, but someone's gotta close this discussion after a week of discussion and more than five weeks of going stale. It wasn't listed on Wikipedia:Proposed mergers anyway. --Admiral Norton ^(talk) 21:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since 90% of the "Republic of Peščenica" is mentioned at Nightmare Stage its notability is part of the TV show. The article content is almost identical.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's part of the TV show, but Peščenica also has out-of-show activities.
On the other hand, the show itself doesn't always show the events from Peščenica. Mostly is live phone-contact and insulting of participants. Sometimes Malnar shows his travellings, and Peščenica Republic is not the subject at all. Kubura (talk) 13:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It would make more sense to merge Nightmare Stage into Republic of Peščenica, given the size of the latter, but I wouldn't agree with that either. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 22:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger from Republic of Peščenica

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge given uncontested counterarguments to the WP:SUSTAINED argument. Klbrain (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out 15 years ago, this micronation has not received any WP:SUSTAINED thorough coverage to pass WP:GNG as a standalone article, but is nonetheless part of this notable TV show, so merge per WP:FAILN. -Vipz (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an examples of SIGCOV from pretty far away and 5 years after its demise. As for print media, the republic had plenty of sustained coverage in Globus in its day, both by its proponents and opponents. Daß Wölf 12:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.