Talk:Nicola Sturgeon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nicola Sturgeon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 19, 2020.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Top‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

intro

Can her arrest and the fraud investigation be included in the intro? She is the second first minister and also the second SNP first minister to be arrested after leaving office which is notable. 82.23.25.205 (talk) 23:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

United States

A line of inaccuracy: Sturgeon had previously stripped Trump of his ambassadorial role for Scottish businesses with the Scottish Government in the aftermath of Trump's views of (an outright ban of Muslims from entering the United States).

The American president called for an immediate suspension Trump travel ban of immigration from high terror states, such as Afghanistan to avoid importing terrorists pretending to be innocent civilians during the ongoing downfall of ISIS, later making remark to the twin towers. Months prior, Trump had stated that in WW2, many Nazi leaders, key persons migrated to the US as civilians, also factual.

This is standard practice across the world & is an accepted practice from within the UN/Legislation, states have the right to 1) protect their citizens, 2) control their borders, 3) deny migration in the interests to preserving safety & security.

The basics of Risk Assessment & the hierarchy of controls, eliminate the risk, or substitute, such as the Rawanda deal, UK.

The problematic issue Nicola had was that trump would suspend all migrants from such states without permitting them a fair check to identify those who may have been related to Islamic terror organisations. Stated by Trump: Why take the risk.

For accuracy, to correct the incorrect (an outright ban of Muslims from entering the United States), to (a suspension of Muslims from high risk countries entering the United States). 194.73.217.222 (talk) 13:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change Large speculation (Under SNP finance fraud inquiry and arrest, para 3) to Widespread speculation PlanetCitation (talk) 00:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - FlightTime (open channel) 00:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PlanetCitation (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her personal life

These are not rumours. These are well-founded allegations that have been widely discussed on the Internet. Sky News, Evening Standard, Daily Mail, Yahoo!, The Telegraph EpicAdventurer (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, these articles just seem to talk about Sturgeon dismissing these 'allegations' – they don't demonstrate how they're, in your words, "well-founded". Secondly the content itself runs afoul of WP:BLPGOSSIP. — Czello ^(music) 13:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These rumors are spread widely around her. This information is no less important than that she had a miscarriage or that she loves reading fiction. EpicAdventurer (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any indication that these rumours are in any way notable. Again, we don't peddle rumours here. — Czello ^(music) 19:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If she is a lesbian, then this is a personal freedom, but for Sturgeon to respond personally to this allegation, this alone gives notice and value to this incident. As I told you, this incident was widely discussed in cyberspace. Why would she have a response to this particular "allegation" if it was just rumors? Do you know how many rumors are spread about famous personalities? EpicAdventurer (talk) 21:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, her responding doesn't make this particular rumour notable. We don't need to document every little thing that happens, especially when nothing of value comes from them. Why would she have a response to this particular "allegation" if it was just rumors? Who can say? Perhaps she was asked directly and answered directly, or perhaps she was just sick of them. That doesn't make it important. Ultimately what's happened is that someone said she was lesbian and she said she wasn't. There's nothing encyclopedic about this. — Czello ^(music) 07:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EpicAdventurer, whatever the merits of your edit, you should not edit war. Respect WP:BRD. You are liable to get blocked if you keep editing in a similar manner.

Turning to the content you want to add, we need to stick to reliable sources, so I'll ignore the Daily Mail article. An encyclopaedia can't and shouldn't mention everything in the life of a person. This rumour and its denial, did they have any lasting impact? All your citations are basically about a single event at one point in time. It doesn't appear to have any lasting significance. WP:BLPGOSSIP applies. Bondegezou (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]