Talk:New Voices (Celtic Connections musical commission)

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Self-published references

@Mccapra: A "self-published" template has been placed on this article.

I have reviewed the references (111 of them at the time of writing) and found:

63 from major newspapers,
5 from the most important magazines in the genre,
3 from a significant independent arts body,
8 from less significant but still independent websites,
11 which are genuinely self-published (mostly CC themselves, plus musicians' own websites),
19 from independent listings magazines.

Sorry if that doesn't quite add up to 111. It was just a quick thing.

So you already have a much larger number of first-class references than you would find in many lists of this type. More importantly, the self-published sources and listings magazines are referenced for the sole purpose of establishing which artists were commissioned in which year. The template asks us to remove "unreliable sources where they are used inappropriately." IMO the use of an event brochure or a listings magazine simply to validate the facts of what event was presented on what date is very appropriate.

Hence I am removing the template. --Monxton (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]