Talk:New Melones Dam

New Melones Dam has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 2, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the New Melones Dam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dams Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Melones Reservoir

I noticed a reference to the Melones Reservoir built in 1926 here -> South San Joaquin Irrigation District; I'm guessing it's the 'old' to this infrastructure's 'new'. It's probably not a notable enough structure to have its own page, but it may appropriate to place it as a sub-section on this page. I don't know enough about it to add more information than is on the SSJID page. CommOERChip (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, create a subsection and include this page as a source. —Stepheng3 (talk) 02:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Melones Dam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 09:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. --Anar chyte 09:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Main review

Overall comments/Misc

Copyvio rating: 75.1% chance of violation of this page.

Not to worry, though. That blog post was on 1 December 2013 and on 6 October 2013, the the article had all the "violated" content.

Lead

Everything is fine here

Specifications

594 ft (181 m) above the streambed.

According to the reference, it's 541.0 ft (164.89 m)

Background and construction

Ref 14 is a dead link with no available archive.

Controversy

For the references in the first paragraph, they all seem to be bunched together at the end, do you think you could change that?

Overall review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: (Pass)

Very nice article, short, sharp and shiny. I'm going to pass this because the issues I mentioned before are minor and can be fixed in an edit. Passed: --Anar chyte 09:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, what a surprise! I was out for the July 4th weekend so didn't expect to see this article reviewed then. I'll go in now and make the fixes you mentioned. Thanks! Shanno n 04:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on New Melones Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]