Talk:New Jersey Route 83/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article needs some work in order for me to consider this as a GA.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The prose is very messy, for example: You use "meets" many times in the description, try "intersects"; "oute 83 was originally legislated as a part of Route 49 in 1927", what does legislated mean?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
It has been almost 2 weeks, no map, failed. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- This article should not have been failed due to lack of a map. Articles are passed or failed according to the good article criteria, and in addition, there is nothing the nominator could have done to create a map. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Okay then, still on hold. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- The article has a map now Dough4872 (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is now a GA. PASS ~~ ComputerGuy 00:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)