Talk:New Jersey Route 56/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
No comments, I added the odd comma, removed the stray extra space (it seems like you use single spacing after periods, so I removed the doubles) and otherwise made Landis Avenue in boldface. Great work, but I guess you know what you're doing by now. Apologies on behalf of Wikipedia for the almost three-month wait, but please don't let that discourage you or hinder more nominations from coming, because it's good work and more appreciated than i may seem. Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]