Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 56

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew Jersey Route 56 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 56/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 23:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    No comments, I added the odd comma, removed the stray extra space (it seems like you use single spacing after periods, so I removed the doubles) and otherwise made Landis Avenue in boldface. Great work, but I guess you know what you're doing by now. Apologies on behalf of Wikipedia for the almost three-month wait, but please don't let that discourage you or hinder more nominations from coming, because it's good work and more appreciated than i may seem. Arsenikk (talk) 23:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]