Talk:New Jersey Route 17/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- The MOS now states that wikilinking dates should only be used when a link is needed in itself, not just by default or for autoformatting purposes. Therefore, all dates in refs should be unlinked. Also, the mile posts should be converted to km. The list of intersections states that it is incomplete. This cannot be excepted in a GA article; either complete it, or make a more neutral statement that only major intersections are included (whatever major is in your opinion).
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Article placed on hold until the matters are resolved. Arsenikk (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- I have gone back and made changes to the article. The junction list is designed in accordance with the guidlines at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Jersey State and County Routes, which calls for a junction list featuring junctions with Interstate Highways, U.S. Routes, state routes, and (optional) county routes. I have only included the 500-series county routes, a statewide county route sytstem used in New Jersey, in the table. Other intersections with Bergen county routes were omitted because it would make the table too long. Dough4872 (talk) 21:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)