Jump to content

Talk:New Frontier (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Frontier (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 19:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'll be reviewing your article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]
  • Needs alt the cover.
  • Need source for that release date.
  • R&B genre is nowhere to be found in the article.
  • The Length could use a source placed in the body of the article.

Lead

[edit]
  • The song was released as the second single from The Nightfly in January 1983 through Warner Bros. Records. → The song was released as the second single from the album in January 1983 through Warner Bros. Records. (we already know which one).
  • Musically, the song contains elements of jazz and funk. → If it contains elements it means it is influenced by, not its genre. Now according to the RS source it is the song's genre. Threfore; Musically, the song has been described as jazz-funk.
  • The song received acclaim from music critics → could use a little more description. Since "Billboard labeled it a top single pick" and "one of Fagen's most delightful tunes." something like this would prove your point.
  • Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is space on both sides.
  • "t was less successful on the charts than its predecessor, however, reaching number 70 on the Billboard Hot 100 in the US. It performed better in the Netherlands, reaching number 47." → First of all, when I check the other song, it has no chart information and Fagen doesn't have a discography page for his solo work. Secondly "however, it reached number 70 on the Billboard Hot 100 in the US." Finally, please see below since there is some issue regarding a chart section.

Background

[edit]
  • Here you have the composition section mixed with the background.
  • I would suggest the fusion of a background and release section.
  • The narrator of the song is a "gawky teenager circa 1962." He has also been described as a "wannabe hipster." → The narrator of the song is a "gawky teenager circa 1962", who has also been described as a "wannabe hipster."
  • He meets a girl → The narrator meets a girl
  • He also holds big → The teenager also holds big
  • "four-note piano riff that functions as a sort of musical exclamation point to certain lines in the verses." → your own words along with some quote
  • "the music sounds as frenetic as the teenage hero's hormones, and its deliberately cheesy tone matches the kid's skin-deep sophistication. → same as previous

Critical reception

[edit]
  • Audio sample needs to be reduced and comply with WP:SAMPLE. Why is even here an audio sample, this belongs to a composition section.
  • It looks like a quotefarm the entire section. Most of the quotes could be said for on your own words.
  • Some of the reviews have a lot more information and valuable one as well, take for instance "The Independent" source.

Music video

[edit]
  • The music video continues the song's concept of a teenage hangout in a bomb shelter. → The music video continues the song's concept of a teenage romantic evening in a bomb shelter. Stick to your sources, hangout could be between friends, romance is not friends for sure.
  • Needs more description the video. What you say in the first sentence just summarizes it up.
  • Once the previous point is done I would consider doing a paragraph to divide the Reception of the music video from the synopsis. However, just paragraphs you don't need the subsections.

Formats and track listing

[edit]
  • Source?
  • Something could be added here as well, some prose
  • Two columns please.
  • Use spaced ndash so there is space on both sides.

Personnel

[edit]
  • Use spaced ndash so there is space on both sides.
  • Where is the producer mentioned?

Charts

[edit]
  • Fine.

References

[edit]
  • Avoid SHOUTING!
  • You don't need to wikilink more than once, only the first time it appears. See "The New York Times" and "Rolling Stone"
  • Discogs in not a reliable source.
  • You have two publishers, either you have publishers for all sources or none of the sources.
[edit]
  • There are no lyrics available. Remove the link.

Overall GA review

[edit]
  • You miss a chart performance section. Only two, three lines in the charts in the "Charts" section would be good enough, since it didn't chart in many places.
  • Missing a composition section as well.
  • I have seen one live performance of this song, should be included as well.
  • I'm sorry but I don't think this is anywhere near GA material, not only it has some inconsistencies throughout the entire article, but also it is also not broad in coverage (quick fail). I will leave some articles with some yet few information regarding this song in order to expand this article in just a quick search in google.

Music Video

[edit]

Who is the girl in the video? -- Sebastian Panwitz (talk) 15:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]