Talk:New Farm Cinemas

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal New Farm Cinemas is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Architecture C‑class Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of exterior of New Farm Cinemas be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Brisbane may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Description

This article raises the occasional headache I've raised before about the description sections in that very large parts of this section are clearly out of date - that the Blue Room is gone entirely is the largest thing, but it's obvious from the article Kerry cited that significant enough internal alterations have been made to the rest that much of the current content regarding them is also outdated. As it stands, the description section is flat-out wrong, but it'd be a shame to lose it entirely - any thoughts about what to do? The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I take an incremental and collaborative view to Wikipedia articles rather than a perfectionist view. I figure that something is better than nothing, and then if someone can improve on that, then it's better than it was. As it stands, the description is perfectly reasonable for the theatre as it was prior to the demolition of the Blue Room and subsequent construction of the multiplex. Maybe the simplest thing is to put a quality tag to that effect in the description section. I think there is a tag for out-of-date information. I will investigate and add as appropriate. Kerry (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestion and done. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you just beat me to it (mine was an edit conflict)! Thanks! Kerry (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have addressed a lot of the problems in the article now. What I can't address is the fact that the Queensland Heritage Register is so out of alignment with reality, but that's Someone Else's Problem. Kerry (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a smart solution. Ta! The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]