Talk:Never Been Kissed

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Never Been Kissed

There is a discussion taking place at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films#References_in_Popular_Culture_Project about such sections, to which you are all invited to contribute. The JPS 12:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Columbine?

This movie may have been the inspiration for the Columbine High School Massacre, as it is not definite whether the initials "NBK" (used by the killers as a code for their mission) referred to Natural Born Killers (as it is often thought), or to this.

Really? Are we sure they weren't referring to the National Bank of Kuwait? Pumpkingrrl 07:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the fact that the movie WAS released less than 2 weeks before the incident at Columbine does make its possibility more likely than other variations of NBK. That being said, I do agree that it's unlikely, and if there's an official source for that logic (say, police or psychologist theory), it should definitely be referenced... Hossenfeffer 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age

Rob is Josie's younger brother, not older. It is said in the movie he is 23 years old, while she is 25.

Premise

The film was based on a real-life reporter's undercover exposé. I just found this out in my journalism class, as my teacher knows the woman that Drew Barrymore's character is based on, Shann Nix. I've added a citation. Yeshuamyking7 22:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A single sentence at the end of this section says the movie was a remake of the 1942 film The Major and the Minor. As I recall, that film was about a woman pretending to be a child to save train fare. Therefore, I have deleted the remake claim. Altgeld (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rating section.

ref Is there a particular reason why the movie's rating in one country deserves its own section? :-) 156.34.209.205 (talk) 02:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

non encylopedic language

some of the language in this article is colloquial rather than encyclopedic, e.g. in the character profile for Anita "no strings attached". Please make the article just a tiny bit more boring, then everybody will be happy. Otherwise it is likely to be ~~ruthless hacked around by somebody~~ "edited mercilessly". David Woodward (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. Intuitively, per those below, it appears unlikely the well known film will not be primary over a television episode, which are not normally known by their titles. But the nomination presented no evidence of primacy, so even in the absence of others, this would default to the status quo in the absence of evidence being presented by commentators.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– I don't know which one is more primary: the Barrymore film or the Glee episode. Nevertheless, after publication of the Glee episode, either this film may no longer be a primary topic as it was before, or there are now two primary topics. — George Ho (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the Glee episode and the numerous other things they could be looking for (although all are redlinks/non articles), I Support the page moves.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There are only two articles that could take the title, and of the two the film is the primary topic, even allowing that some Glee readers come through the film's hatnote. Although the Glee episode was the primary topic about a year ago for the few months after its airing, its readership has dropped steadily and tremendously from 381K in Nov 2010 to 59K in Jan 2011 to 8K in Jan 2012, while the film is fairly steady in the 25-30K range. Station1 (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; it's difficult to compare a single episode of a television series to a full-length feature film. Most people don't even know the names of television episodes. Powers ^T 19:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The well-known feature film makes the episode look obscure by comparison. 67.194.69.67 (talk) 00:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.