Talk:Neutra VDL Studio and Residences
A fact from Neutra VDL Studio and Residences appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article was nominated for deletion on March 15, 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comical
[edit]This reads almost like a parody of modernist pretentiousness and self-delusion. To read it, one would thing that before these geniuses of banality came along no-one had ever built a house on 4,200 square feet of land before. That's more than most of the multi-million pound townhouses of central London for heaven's sake. This shoddy dross isn't anything to do with "urban living" because it is in a suburb and was built with suburbanist escapism in mind. It is as suburban as any McMansion. Choalbaton (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Who do you mean to insult, the architects or the wikipedia article editors (including me)? And, do you have any suggestion for improving the article? Thanks for your reaction, anyhow. :) doncram (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
name, name
[edit]Neutra, Richard and Dion, VDL Research House II reads like an index entry. Is it really called that, and not "Richard and Dion Neutra VDL Research House II"? —Tamfang (talk) 21:31, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. And i think it is how the house's name appears in the National Register's NRIS database. I'll change the article now to use the unwrapped version, as you suggest, now. --doncram (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neutra VDL Studio and Residences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717011339/https://win.webdev.csupomona.edu/sppr/response.aspx?id=121 to https://win.webdev.csupomona.edu/sppr/response.aspx?id=121
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- High-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of High-importance
- Start-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- Start-Class Southern California articles
- Mid-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles