Talk:Network isolator

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Computer network#Basic hardware components|active network components]] The anchor (Basic hardware components) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Ethernet standard

The Ethernet standard (802.3) specifies 1 kV isolation on every Ethernet port. I assume this article is talking about isolation above and beyond that. --Kvng (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isolation and line coding

Per my discussion Talk:Ethernet, I'm trying to understand how line coding relates to the feasibility of network isolation using an isolation transformer. In particular, I gather that USB, which appears to use NRZI, cannot easily be isolated. My sense is that this relates either to technical issues with NRZI, or to the fact that USB uses other tricks (like pulling a data line high) that can't be seen over a transformer. Since Fast Ethernet uses MLT-3 not Manchester coding, it's clear that Manchester isn't the only coding that can be passed through a transformer.

So: Is there a mathematical property of a line coding that allows it to be transmitted through a transformer? Is it just that bits need to be encoded as edges rather than as voltages? Thanks. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The property is DC balance. -—Kvng 15:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]