Talk:Netherlands Marine Corps

Military history: Maritime / Dutch / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Gibraltar#The British period|captured]] The anchor (#The British period) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Leopard 1#BARV|Leopard 1 BARV]]
[[Leopard 1#BARV|Leopard 1 BARVs]]
[[Land Rover Defender#110|Land Rover 110XD]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Fair use rationale for Image:Korps Mariniers.jpg

Image:Korps Mariniers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Korps Mariniers.jpg

Image:Korps Mariniers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea

Hey,

I know for a fact that marines train there in the jungles. It can be edited in. Also, respect for the guys in Ar Rumaythah andAl Khidr ;) 81.68.255.36 (talk) 18:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recruitment and Training

"Only men are allowed to serve as marines but many female navy personnel are attached to
marine corps units as cooks, administrators, nurses or medical officers."

Ugh... really? Cooks? Could we formulate this better? Because this just looks wrong. (No, I'm not female.)

There are also female navy pilots who work closely with marines.
There are also male navy personnel that cook for the marines.
Actually, why mention anything further then "Only men are allowed to serve as marines.".

Thx.217.121.86.187 (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

I've added some more info, as recent as I could find, but this whole article kinda needs an overhaul because of al the military restructuring in the past. Some sections are current, others are not. Operational marines are now all trained up to to SOC standard, and this influences all prior restructure training courses. I've worked on the Dutch Wikipedia article NLMARSOF as well, and recent info is really hard to come by. I've emailed several authorities but was send back and forth until I got tired of it. Karel Adriaan (talk) 07:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTOM toughness level

The article requested a needed citation, and I found a Dutch article covering this topic.

The cited website states that most applicants won't make it through POTOM selection. Those that do, often are a very a small group, "enkele tientallen" (literally "some tens", translating to "a few dozen"). Of those few dozen, well over 50% won't make it.

It's very simple. First of all, POTOM selection/training is much more demanding than the EVO. It's simple logic. POTOM = EVO + More. For a perhaps better understanding you can check the Royal Marines training/selection for officers, POC. The Royal Marines and Dutch Marines undergo almost identical training, and personnel are constantly exchanged between the two. They're basically non-identical twins.

Second, the Netherlands has three Special Forces units, KCT, NLMARSOF and the BSB. Only one of those uses an initial training course where civilians can directly apply to, the Korps Commandotroepen. The other two recruit only from experienced personnel, so initial training has happened beforehand. All the regular military units and the elite Airmobile Brigade use a less demanding initial training course then that of the Korps Mariniers.

So saying that POTOM training is the most demanding is simply not true. The Korps Commandotroepen has an attrition rate of up to 100% overall, and up to 95% for experienced military personnel. No marine officer comes even close. Karel Adriaan (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Netherlands Marine Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070901054315/http://www.korpsmariniers.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard312/ikonboard.cgi to http://www.korpsmariniers.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard312/ikonboard.cgi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jochan de Witt.

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm looking for a Marine officer named Roon, who was the head of the Dutch team in the Soviet Union, when delivering humanitarian aid to Kazan in April 1991. We are talking about very important things related to the history and culture of your state. I am in Cologne, without documents, with the most disgusting status ("suspension of deportation"). Rune knows me and I trust him. He was an officer in the Royal Netherlands Marines. With a request to help me find this person (if he is still alive). Sincerely, Iskander Ulumbekov, photojournalist. (mrechius@gmail.com) My residential address is: Haus Worringen, zimmer 204, Alte Neusser Landstrasse, 273, Koln-Worringen, BRD. 2001:16B8:A33:7C00:E00C:DA52:C359:5F7 (talk) 11:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uniforms

In the Uniforms part of the Traditions section, there is incomplete information. The line about mess dress uniform currently reads as “and consists of a smoking,”. The meaning of this is unclear. Someone should explain it so it can be written in a better way. Dreddmoto (talk) 20:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Organisation

That section currently lacks any mention of the Rotterdam Marine Band of the Royal Netherlands Navy. One small subsection could be added there, equivalent in size to the subsection titled Marine Education Centre. Dreddmoto (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]