Talk:Neo-Freudianism
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Confusing
[edit]I found this article really confusing. Especially the opening paragraph. Óli Gneisti (talk) 10:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
This is all utterly misleading
[edit]The term 'Neo-Freudian' is, I think, correctly used for a group of post-Freudians that includes Erich Fromm and Karen Horney. It shouldn't be used to encompass the likes of Jung or Lacan. This is an extremely misleading article that needs major changes. Skoojal (talk) 04:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
From bad to neutral
[edit]In the spirit of the above, I have removed from the list[s] every name I was certain was not a Neo-Freudian, and hope in the process to have moved the article up from extremely misleading to at least neutral. It really needs attention from a specialist in 20th century American Psa for possible second generation links to the Neo-Freudians: Unger? I have no idea if the name belongs here or not....Jacobisq (talk) 06:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)