Talk:Ned Garver
Ned Garver has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 5, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3rd paragraph
[edit]RIP the great Ned Garver, maybe the unluckiest pitcher of them all.
Anyway, 3rd paragraph is
- Garver remains the only pitcher in modern baseball history (post-1920) to win 20 or more games for a team which lost 100 or more games in the same season, and the only pitcher to do so with a winning record.
Well but if he's the only pitcher to win 20, then of course then (since he had a winning record) he's the only pitcher to win 20 with a winning record. It's redundant. I'm not sure what we're trying to say here: "He's the only pitcher in modern baseball history (post-1920) to win 20 or more games for a team which lost 100 or more games in the same season, and what's more, he even had a winning record" or is it "He's the only pitcher in modern baseball history (post-1920) to win 20 or more games for a team which lost 100 or more games in the same season, and the only pitcher ever -- even going back before 1920 all the way to the start of major league baseball -- to do so with a winning record." It could be clearer. Herostratus (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ned Garver/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 19:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello there, I'll be reviewing this one using the table below. Don't know much about baseball (besides how to play and some stuff about the Braves), but I like sports so. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 19:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Baseball articles
- Low-importance Baseball articles
- GA-Class Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim articles
- Unknown-importance Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim articles
- Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Ohio articles
- Low-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles