Talk:Nationwide injunction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nationwide injunction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference ideas for Nationwide injunction

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/20200123-NationwideInjunctionsForum-ReadingList_0.pdf
Joanna R. Lampe, Nationwide Injunctions: Law, History, and Proposals for Reform, Congressional Research Service (Sep. 8, 2021).
Joanna R. Lampe, Nationwide Injunctions: Recent Legal Developments, Congressional Research Service (Dec. 2, 2021).
Mila Sohoni, The Power to Vacate a Rule, 88 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1121 (2020).
Ronald M. Levin, Vacatur, Nationwide Injunctions, and the Evolving APA, 98 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1997 (2023).
Aaron Blake, The rise of solo judges halting nationwide policies, The Washington Post (Apr. 20, 2022).
Nicholas Bagley, A Single Judge Shouldn’t Have This Kind of National Power, The Atlantic (Apr. 14, 2023).
Jonathan H. Adler, On Universal Vacatur, the Supreme Court, and the D.C. Circuit, Yale J. on Regul.: Notice & Comment (Mar. 1, 2023).
John Harrison, Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act Does Not Call for Universal Injunctions or Other Universal Remedies, Yale J. on Regul.: Notice & Comment (Apr. 12, 2020).
Kelsey Reichmann, Judicial Conference adopts rule to curb judge shopping, Courthouse News Service (Mar. 12, 2024).
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-137/district-court-reform-nationwide-injunctions/

Requested move 30 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National injunction → Nationwide injunction – "Nationwide injunction" is the WP:COMMONNAME. This includes use in books per Google Ngrams and in scholarly articles per Google Scholar (1460 for "nationwide injunction", 471 for "national injunction", 441 for "universal injunction"). (If limited to articles since 2019, the corresponding numbers are 621, 257, and 139.) Some scholars or judges prefer to avoid "nationwide" as imprecise (see National injunction#Terminology) since these injunctions can extend to actions abroad (hence "universal injunction") or be limited to a judicial circuit, state, etc. SilverLocust 💬 11:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support common name per nom. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Whatever one thinks they should be called, clearly they are called nationwide injunctions per the data above (and a quick ProQuest search suggests the gap is even more pronounced in press coverage). And since there's no real ambiguity about what the phrase "nationwide injunction" refers to, this isn't a case where we have to avoid the common name for WP:PRECISION reasons. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.