Talk:National Synarchist Union

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Synarchist Union article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

.

Mexican synarchism should be merged into this article. The UNS is (to my knowledge) the only Mexican synarchist organization, so we're basically having two articles on the same subject now.

The article on Mexican synarchism mentions various other organizations. My impression is to keep the two separate. --Soman (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the Popular Force Party and the Mexican Democratic Party? Those were basically branches of the UNS. Mixcoatl (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World Union of National Socialists

Does anyone have a source on UNS entry into the World Union of National Socialists?

I don't see any mention on them on the UNS website or any third party sources claiming this other then wiki. If we cannot source this it would be better to remove it.TheAmericanWarlord (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source for US intelligence on ideology section

The “declassified US intelligence report”‘s source is off-the-walls insane, ripe with conspiracy theories.

It says things such as “The March 11, 2004 train bombing in Madrid, and former Spanish Prime Minister José María Aznar's warning that he is certain that there will be a terrorist incident in the United States before the U.S. elections, further point to the danger LaRouche identified last year, of a Reichstag Fire-type terrorist attack under Hispanic cover, as part of a desperate effort to keep the besieged Cheney-centered neo-cons in power.”

And

“an organization created in 1937 by the Nazis, operating through the Spanish Falange and in conjunction with the Japanese” (I’m pretty sure that the Japanese had nothing to do with the UNS, and no reliable source says that they were invented by Nazis)

as well as “ organize in Mexico and in the United States. Moreover, although initially created by the Nazis as a fifth column in Mexico directed at the United States, after Pearl Harbor and after the Nazi defeat at Stalingrad, the UNS was taken over by the same anti-Roosevelt, Anglo-American imperialist faction that is behind Dick Cheney and his allies in the Democratic National Committee today.”. This reads like QAnon. Does anyone actually believe the DNC is running a Mexican Catholic-Nationalist organization?

I actually can’t read any further down without going insane, but a quick skim tells me they somehow tied in the Society of Jesus and the Romanian Iron Guard.

I don’t think this is the type of source that should be used on Wikipedia, so I’m going to remove the things cited from it. TheAmericanWarlord (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]