Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Washington state

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as High-importance).

Rosario

We have [[Moran State Park|Rosario (Orcas Island, Washington)]]. I believe this is wrong: Rosario Resort should have its own link. Although Robert Moran, after whom the park is named, is the founder of the Rosario Resort (it is centered around the Moran Mansion), the resort is outside the park, and it is the resort, not the park, that is in the National Register. See WASHINGTON - San Juan County on the official site of the National Register of Historic Places. - Jmabel | Talk 06:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

After looking at the Illinois list, I thought it might be nice to do something similar to this list, though with the addition of photos in the table (see the lists for Bellingham and Seattle), and possible tweaking the other info in the table. Possibly something along the lines of "Name" and "ID#/"Date built" and "Date listed"/Photo in three columns? Anybody else have ideas/suggestions/thoughts? Murderbike (talk) 05:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Msm-aerialview.jpg

Image:Msm-aerialview.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia River Quarantine Station

When this Pacific County entry is created, PDF page 7 has an article on it that might provide some useful info. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Capital punishment in Washington which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Register of Historic Places listings in Washington state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507031748/http://www.dahp.wa.gov/pages/HistoricSites/documents/HistoricPlacesinWashingtonReport_006.pdf to http://www.dahp.wa.gov/pages/HistoricSites/documents/HistoricPlacesinWashingtonReport_006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An overall NRHP listing for U.S. Post Offices?

Hey everyone!

In an NRHP search for the Chehalis Post Office draft I'm working on, I came across this form - [1] - mentioning a combination listing of all U.S. Post Office's in Washington state built between 1893 and 1941.

Not quite understanding if it's a separate NRHP listing, but I do see that it is at least approved documentation that may be used as a resource to list individual post offices in the state. Either way, to those with more experience - should we include this to the article if it's only a resource?

My thanks! Shortiefourten (talk) 18:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]