Talk:Natasha Vita-More

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Transhumanism Low‑importance

Natasha Vita-More' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help click Show:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Quick help:

See changes to:

To Do List:

edit - history - watch - purge

Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold

Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt an article.
Help out with the To-do lists

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles)
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles

Maintenance / Etc

Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
And always write for an encyclopedia.

Create

Notable transhumanist articles

Shorten / merge into others

Expand

a transhumanism stub

Your immediate attention

false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.

Alternative views

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Natasha Vita-More (talk · contribs)

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

TetrahedreX (talk · contribs)

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Importance Tag

I'm failing to see the importance of this particular person; googling her name brings up page after page of ads. Where's the notability? RasputinAXP _talk _contribs 05:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said before, I don't think an importance tag is necessary. However, I do think Natasha Vita-More deserves a Wikipedia article because she was a pioneer of the transhumanist movement. --Loremaster 17:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you throw some links up? I'm not joking when I say I can't find anything that's not an ad. RasputinAXP _talk _contribs 18:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Here is one: http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0331,baard,45866,1.html --Loremaster 19:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, considering that the "World Transhumanist Association" consists of a little over 5000 members, having such long bios of any of their "leaders" online is a bit dubious. The whole organization is a media invention, and the only reason they have such a large wikipedia footprint is that many of their disciples are heavy editors. 69.254.136.113 (talk) 11:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like self-promotion to me, not generally notable. Studied at obscure universities, works for an obscure organization. Definitely a candidate for deletion. Pawg14 (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a good deletion candidate. There are reliable sources eg. here, here, here, here, here, and here. The article could use a bunch of cleanup, though. NeatGrey (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll work on cleaning up and shortening it. Should the headshot be deleted? It makes it feel like a personal webpage, particularly when the person is of minor importance. 23:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Pawg14 (talk)

Maybe replace with this image? It's freely licensed, and feels like less of a PR shot. In general, I think having at least one (freely licensed and appropriate) photo usually improves bio pages. NeatGrey (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's also this freely licensed image NeatGrey (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first image is appropriate, but sorry don't know how to upload images. I'm new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawg14 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stub classification

How can Vita-More's occupation be classified, if not philosopher? Biologist? Activist? Businessperson? Anything else? Also, where is she from? Article doesn't refer to her nationality. Conscious 13:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Artist from the United States of America. --Loremaster 20:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Conscious 21:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text contrary to Wikipedia policy - Biography of Living Persons

I have, for the third time, removed some text that is clearly against the policy due to being contentious and unsourced. If it appears again I will be asking for a page lock Hpengwyn 13:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish someone could fix the footnote formatting for me. I've tried to just cut and paste, but it's not working for two of the references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAdmirer (talk • contribs) 00:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

Information appears to be referenced. If anyone can locate unreferenced information, please let me know and I'll hunt it down. Rchelsey (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Vita-More's Chronological Age

Whomever keeps putting my my age, I will ask to kindly stop. You do not know when I was born, and unless you are my mother, and you are taking great liberties with my name for that matter. "Nancy Clark" was not my birth name on my birth certificate. My mother is still alive and anyone can ask her if you do not believe me.

Under Wikipedia rules for Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. If the subject objects to using her age only use the year. See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Privacy_of_personal_information_and_using_primary_sources. The above request was made by User:Natasha Vita-More, so her preferences should be respected and the day and month of birth should not be included on this article. Waters.Justin (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Waters.Justin. And in fact the subject has specifically written about age (http://www.natasha.cc/ageless.htm), about its overuse, and I gather would prefer the year not be used, but the policy is just that birth month and day and calculated age can be omitted. I'm just changing it to use template {{birth-date}} which allows just birth year and does not calculate age. Not sure how month and day can be deleted from associated wiki-data (not visible in article, but presumably present), but that should be done too. --do ncr am 00:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tags

I've added cites and deleted a bunch of uncited/trivia material; the "poorly cited" etc. cleanup tags no longer seem relevant. Bmrg567 (talk) 08:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

The following Links in the External-Links-section are dead: Technoccult, La Spirale, MemeBox Future Blogger, Tin Foil Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.222.157.190 (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fixed Pawg14 (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know TetrahedreX is a connected contributor?

Why was User:TetrahedreX added as a connected contributor? I don't see any evidence this editor is connected to the subject other than most of the user's contributions were of the subject. If there is not any evidence TetraedreX is connected then I recommend removing the template from the article because the few edits done by User:Natasha Vita-More do not justify the template stating "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." Waters.Justin (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship to FM-2030?

FM-2030's page states that he was married to Vita-More, while on this page it states that he was a close friend.

LisaTolsky (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't married, but they were romantically involved for about a decade: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zmQL8by_nY#t=17m25s Dogah (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

update

Updated the page based on existing references and material, added works and education and more references. I was working on ES wiki and found that one less updated. Collected information from different language pages that already exists. Superuomo rinascere (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace?

Is she from Bronxville, New York or Eastchester, New York?

Ethan Barrows (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]